Abstract image to illustrate AI in creative work

The grudge purchase: why design is often valued too late

One of the most interesting phrases I’ve heard about design is that it’s a grudge purchase.

It’s not a term that appears in many branding books, but it immediately rings true. A grudge purchase is something people buy because they feel they have to, not because they genuinely want to. Things like car insurance, new tyres or dental work are money spent to avoid a negative outcome rather than create a positive one.

For many businesses, design falls into exactly the same category. It is treated as an operational expense rather than an investment, often left until the last minute or approached with the question, “How cheaply can we get away with this?”

The surveyor’s dilemma

My wife works as a Practice Manager for a chartered surveying practice, and she regularly sees buyers spending hundreds of thousands or even millions of pounds on a property while trying to minimise the cost of the survey.

The logic seems simple enough: the house looks fine, the location is perfect, and the survey feels like an additional expense that doesn’t contribute to the purchase itself.

But that’s precisely the point of the survey; it exists to uncover the things that are easy to miss before the commitment is made. Structural movement, damp, roofing problems – the kinds of hidden defects that can become expensive issues later.

The survey isn’t there to make the house look better. It’s there to help you understand what you’re actually buying. I often think design occupies a remarkably similar position in business.

Why design becomes a grudge purchase

Most founders don’t start a business because they’re passionate about typography, user experience or visual identity systems. They start because they believe in a product, a service or an idea.

As the business begins to take shape, money naturally flows towards the things that feel tangible and measurable: software, equipment, operations, legal work, accounting, project management tools and internal processes. Design, by contrast, often feels subjective.

Good design is surprisingly invisible. When a website is easy to navigate, a brand feels trustworthy, or a product is immediately understandable, people rarely stop to admire the design. They simply move forward without friction.

That invisibility can make design seem optional; it becomes something to add later, or something to do as cheaply as possible, rather than something that helps shape the business from the beginning.

Buying blind

Imagine purchasing a property without a survey because the kitchen looked modern and the walls had recently been painted – you might get away with it – or you might discover six months later that the roof needs replacing and the foundations are moving. Businesses often make the same mistake.

A founder looks at a working product, a simple logo and a functional website and assumes they are ready for the market. But the role of design isn’t simply to make those things look attractive. It’s to ask deeper questions: Can people understand what this business does? Is the message clear? Does the website guide visitors towards a decision? Does the visual identity create trust? Does the experience feel coherent from one touchpoint to the next?

A surveyor looks beneath the surface of a building – a designer looks beneath the surface of communication. Both are trying to identify structural problems before they become expensive.

The cost of design debt

In software, there’s a well-known concept called technical debt. Shortcuts taken early in development eventually make future progress slower and more expensive – design creates a similar kind of debt.

Many startups pour the majority of their early funding into advertising, assuming that traffic is the problem. But if that traffic lands on a confusing website with weak messaging and poor user experience, the business is simply paying to send people into a leaky bucket.

Conversion rates fall. Marketing budgets disappear. The product gets blamed. The market gets blamed. In reality, the business may never have communicated its value clearly in the first place.

Sometimes the debt becomes even more expensive. Entire websites are rebuilt, brands are redesigned, packaging is replaced and customer trust has to be rebuilt because the original design never reflected the business clearly enough.

The cheapest design decision is often the most expensive business decision.

The things customers actually see

One of the ironies of modern business is that companies will invest heavily in systems their customers never encounter while trying to minimise investment in the things customers interact with every day.

Customers don’t see your CRM, your project management software or your internal workflow documents. They see your website, your logo, your emails, your packaging, your signage, your social media, your presentations and your invoices. Design is not a decorative layer applied after the important work has been done. It is one of the primary ways a business communicates competence, clarity and intent.

A different way to think about design

Perhaps the problem is not that businesses undervalue design; perhaps they misunderstand what they are buying. A survey is not an expensive piece of paperwork. It is expertise applied at the moment when it can have the greatest impact.

Design is the same – it is not simply the production of attractive graphics; it is the process of understanding what a business is trying to say, how people experience it, and where friction, confusion or mistrust might exist before those problems become expensive.

The businesses that tend to benefit most from design are often the ones that involve a designer early, not because they want something beautiful, but because they want someone whose job it is to see what they may not be able to see for themselves.

The most valuable expertise is rarely the expertise that fixes a problem after it appears; it is the expertise that helps prevent the problem from existing in the first place. That is why I don’t think design should be treated as a grudge purchase. I think it should be treated as part of the foundation.

Establish what matters. Design with purpose. Build brands that last.